What an allocator should know before sizing the position.
There is no single chart that proves a strategy. There is, however, a coherent argument for why a portfolio behaves the way it does, and that argument is what survives the next market regime.
A systematic structured-product strategy for investors who require institutional rigour, transparent downside, and predictable compounding. USD-denominated worst-of autocall notes on US underliers. Underwritten weekly since January 2026.
There is no single chart that proves a strategy. There is, however, a coherent argument for why a portfolio behaves the way it does, and that argument is what survives the next market regime.
Structured-product issuance relies on standardised pricing engines built for distribution scale. They are calibrated to the average. The firm operates the underwriting layer those engines omit.
The firm operates a systematic underwriting cycle, not a discretionary trade desk. The same quantitative quality gates run every week against the same point-in-time data. Allocation decisions are escalated to human review only at predefined inflection points; routine deployment is mechanical. Each ten-year retrospective uses the exact code that runs today, with no forward-looking inputs.
Every deployable position is traced from the canonical opportunity surface, through the deterministic MC-ranked selection pipeline, to executor validation. The deployment authority is the systematic ranker; no hidden side-channels can bypass it. For strategy variants that route through AI review, every AI selection is similarly required to clear the same executor validation before deploy.
Operational reference run over the 2-year window 2024-04-15 to 2025-12-29: +5.4% gross MTM return, 3.22% maximum drawdown, 1 barrier breach across 52 positions. Partial V2 PIT IV grid (~47% backfill). All performance figures shown are gross of management and performance fees.
Operational reference run. The reference window (2024-04-15 to 2025-12-29) reflects the production strategy under rigorous underwriting thresholds with partial V2 PIT IV grid coverage (~47% backfill). Capital deployment dynamically scales based on prevailing pricing conditions, averaging ~19% investment level during the period. Past performance is an operational reference and does not guarantee future results; a real stress regime would likely produce different outcomes.
Two bases. MTM (mark-to-market) is the redemption-relevant NAV a fund administrator strikes — interim marks move with the underlyings before maturity. Nominal is the hold-to-maturity economic yield (coupons plus capital returned, including any breach loss). Risk is reported on the MTM basis.
| Metric | Operational reference 2y partial V2 IV window |
|---|---|
| Nominal CAGR (Gross, headline — hold-to-maturity) | +3.38% |
| MTM CAGR (Gross, mark-to-market) | +3.13% |
| Gross income yield | 5.34% |
| Net yield (after 1.25% mgmt + perf fee) | 4.02% |
| of which cash interest (idle cash @ 4%) | ~70% |
| MTM Max Drawdown | 3.22% |
| MTM Sharpe · Sortino | −0.23 · −0.35 |
| MTM Total Return (Gross, 2 years) | +5.39% |
| Annualised volatility (MTM) | 2.62% |
| Positions deployed in window | 52 |
| Avg invested (capital deployment) | 19.0% |
| Barrier breaches / positions | 1 / 52 |
| Avg booked coupon per position (Gross) | 7.3% |
| Fee basis | All metrics shown are gross of management and performance fees. Conditional+memory coupons; investor takes coupon-skip risk when worst-of falls below the coupon barrier at observation. |
Reference window 2024-04-15 to 2025-12-29 (90 weekly observations). Partial V2 PIT IV grid (~47% backfill). One operational reference run of the production strategy. Capital deployment dynamically scales based on prevailing pricing conditions, averaging ~20% investment level during the period. Past performance is an operational reference and does not guarantee future results; a real stress regime would likely produce different outcomes. All metrics are gross of management and performance fees. MTM is the redemption-relevant mark-to-market NAV basis; nominal is the hold-to-maturity economic yield (coupons + capital returned, incl. any breach loss). Risk is reported on the MTM basis; nominal Sharpe/Sortino are mechanically degenerate on a 0-breach window and omitted.
Each position is executed in the standardised institutional autocall format. Capital recycles on a known schedule.
| Entered | Pair | Tenor | Coupon | MTM | Worst-of | Cushion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loading live positions... | ||||||
Open positions on the live track. Worst-of structures with 50% European knock-in barrier and 70% autocall trigger. MTM is the unrealised price differential since entry; coupons are realised on autocall or maturity. Cushion is the percentage-point distance from the 50% barrier. Per-position coupons shown are modeled booking estimates, not executed trades; the executable rate on any individual position may differ by approximately ±3 percentage points (2-sigma band). At the fund level, modeled coupons are within ~1.2 pp mean absolute error of the competitive market.
The current production strategy is USD-denominated. Non-USD share classes are a roadmap item.